Cruising In Jhb Is It Safe To Descend From Cruising Altitude To The Runway In One Smooth Glide?

Is it safe to descend from cruising altitude to the runway in one smooth glide? - cruising in jhb

Sydney Morning Herald recently reported that in 2013, will allow approximately 100 airports in Europe from the aircraft cruising altitude to start and go down runway in a gentle glide. This is to reduce carbon emissions and save fuel. Yo vivo en route past and I wonder if this is safer than the current practice.

7 comments:

Jason said...

Not only security, is ideal.

We would like to have this system as a pilot, because it leads to a reduced workload and allows us to focus our attention on other areas of the flight. One of the biggest areas of failure (or "pilot deviations" in the jargon) occurs when the allocation of aircraft complicated restrictions on the origin of the intersection. It is easy to make a mistake and to other near an airplane. The implementation of this system a long way to eliminate those mistakes.

And if they are concerned, they are generally in power in the downtime. We add power again and again, if we are forced to rise. There would be no difference in the experimental technique for this country compared to what we used is now used only to consume less fuel, less noise, eliminate many potential conflicts, and make your flight cheaper.

Techwing said...

It is absolutely secure.

Airplanes that are currently slipping on their stations and airports, but now tends to facilitate agent at different altitudes to stabilize the air traffic control. A Continuous Descent Approach (CDA), but only allows the aircraft to its descent from cruising altitude and begin the descent through without updating until you're ready for the final approach to the airport.

The two forms of organization rejects have no effect on safety. This change is primarily a process that we hope that the air traffic control to simplify and reduce fuel consumption.

coolfizz said...

Well, it can be too much, because the airlines a lot of fuel than idling Desender to contact the title to save ....

But that required a special authorization from ATC can be difficult in the current traffic Senario ....
This will reduce carbon emissions because it burns less fuel.
These can interfere at all, because the airlines have GPS and sophisticated equipment is ........ do not worry not at all ... pilotswill Infact I think everyone would agree that the stay in the flight path of love and will see the airplane all day ....!!.... is the best pilot to be ...!!

Robert G said...

Its safe. To understand why this is a good idea is to understand the following ...
1) It burns more fuel at low altitude cruise altitude. This is because the air is so thick mixed with more fuel. So keep on airplanes and saves fuel.
2) Each time you level, increasing at a rate to be (should fuel) thrust stabilize at that level.
If you can stay longer cruise and then perform a constant decrease can reduce the amount of required fuel (I guess that carbon emissions are concerned, I'm just a driver does not have on emissions).

Irv S said...

It is safer, more efficient and convenient location.
The problems of the traffic stop in the rule.
With adequate pre-planning, implementation and control far enough
could that be possible, but some are still "screw up the factory.

CITATION CAPT. said...

From what I UPS and catch something like that? Rumors, rumors

Flight Instructor said...

If you give us a URL of this article, it would be useful.

Post a Comment